
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Fire resistant decking</title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612460</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:27:41 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 May 2021 18:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2021 National Forest Homeowners</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1612460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Fire resistant decking</title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612460</link>
<guid>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612460</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;">The Forest Service has just denied my proposal to replace my old, dry wooden deck planks with Trex, which is a composite material that looks very much like wood, but carries a Class B fire spread rating, as opposed to wood which is class C.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000;">While I strongly support keeping our cabins authentic, I believe fire safety should take precedence in horizontal decking which is very likely to spread a fire should an ember land on it. I'd note that the FS doesn't require that our roofs be covered in wood shingles, so I don't understand their reasoning.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000;">Does the NFH have any stand on this issue, and would it support any kind of lobbying to change the FS policy on this matter?</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000;">Thanks.</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2021 18:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612516</link>
<guid>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612516</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">The USFS does not have a national policy that prevents the use of composite decking material. However, the <b>Region 5 Handbook</b> (cabins in CA) does state a preference for "natural in-kind" replacement materials;</span></p><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i>Missing elements should be replaced in-kind where possible; if not possible they should be replaced with similar appearing materials. Natural or organic materials are recommended as replacement; concrete, steel, glass, and other may be allowed <u>if appropriately used</u>.</i></span></p></blockquote><p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="white-space:pre;">	</span>The R5 handbook is attached below for reference.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">If the cabin tract has been determined have <b>historical significance</b>, there is a greater emphasis on the use of natural materials, however, exceptions can still be made. The following are references taken from the <b>USFS Guide to Maintaining the Historical Characteristics of your Recreation Residence</b> (page 22):</span></p><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i><i style="font-family: 'Century Gothic', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">If the original porch, deck, railing, or any of its distinctive elements has deteriorated<br />beyond repair, replace the unserviceable pieces with new materials that match the original appearance, pattern, size, scale, proportions, textures, colors, and details.</i></i></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><i>Do not use substitute materials that change the appearance of the porch, deck, or railing, such&nbsp;</i></span><i style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">as stainless steel cables. Substitute material that simulates the appearance of the original material&nbsp;</i><i style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><u>may be approved on a case-by-case basis</u>.</i></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Century Gothic', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: #000000;">The District Ranger can approve a substitute material in our opinion. You make a valid argument that a composite decking material is a safer alternative with a similar appearance to the original wood material. We recommend you resubmit your request to the District Ranger, and/or if denied again, escalate to the Forest Supervisor (file an Administrative Appeal if necessary).</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2021 22:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612630</link>
<guid>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1612630</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the feedback, Doug. Our FS people are very intractable, and I know they won't consider this, based on reason.<br />The District Ranger stated that she will not have Trex in her (!) recreational residences, so I guess I'll have to install a more flammable material and hope that doesn't come back to bite us.,<br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 May 2021 19:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
