
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Hazardous tree removal</title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1776587</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 05:06:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 23:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2025 National Forest Homeowners</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1776587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Hazardous tree removal</title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1776587</link>
<guid>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1776587</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello NFH community.</p><p>I'm a cabin owner in the small Casa Loma Tract in the Tahoe Nat'l Forest (near Alta/Dutch Flat CA ). A couple of years ago years ago the FS came thru and marked dozens of trees for what we thought was going to be a general thinning of the forest for fuel reduction/fire safety.&nbsp; A member of our Assoc spoke with a FS rep and it was insinuated that it was going to be part of a commercial timber harvest and subsidized by FS, ie paid for by them. Then last year the FS contacted cabin owners and identified (by numbered tree tags) which trees had to be removed AT CABIN OWNERS EXPENSE using a licensed and insured tree company. FS claimed that my tree was diseased (cankers) and could fall and damage MY cabin. Other cabin owners did have dead trees around their lots but many had living trees but FS said they were diseased. My tree cost $1000 to have taken down. My tree company and arborist said <span style="text-decoration: underline;">after it was cut down</span> that it was perfectly healthy and would have stood for decades. Several other of the cabin owners are ignoring the FS directive. I don't know whether that is prudent.&nbsp;</p><p>In the meantime, FS has said that the timber harvest sale program in my portion of TNF isn't likely to happen anytime soon as the nearest lumber mills are at capacity.</p><p>Have any other cabin tracts had any issues such as the one I've described?</p><p>Thanks, Rick Fend&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1823139</link>
<guid>https://www.nationalforesthomeowners.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1823139</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The upcoming permit language talks about this, though I’m not sure how its enforceable outside your individual lot boundaries regarding rights-of-way. I don’t see where it mandates using a contractor, perhaps that’s your risk decision based on circumstances. <br />Sad to hear your FS district identified a healthy tree as diseased. :-(<br /><br />III.D.  INSPECTION OF THE PERMIT AREA. The holder is responsible for inspecting the permit<br />area (using Form FS-2700-6b, Recreation Residence Self-Inspection Report), authorized rights-of-<br />way, and adjoining areas for dangerous trees, hanging limbs, and other evidence of hazardous conditions that could affect the authorized improvements or pose a risk to public safety. After<br />obtaining written approval from the authorized officer, the holder shall remove these hazards at<br />the holder’s expense.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
